Her petition, filed by means of her lawyer Rizwan Sidiqquee, mentioned the BMC motion at “such quick discover” was “arbitrary and mala fide’’ and a “fallout over the distinction of opinion with sure influential folks working within the administration and the federal government.” It sought orders to forestall BMC from “taking legislation into their very own palms or misusing their dominant place to harass and prejudice her authorized rights”.
The BMC mentioned she had “unlawfully commenced” work on part of her bungalow for her workplace. Her petition mentioned she was issued a discover on September 7 giving her simply “24 hours” to point out compliance failing which the continuing work could be razed at her “threat and price’. The Discover, her petition mentioned “was with out software of thoughts, in violation of ideas of pure justice, unreasonable and improper,”and must be put aside.
Her petition she is a “public spirited one who persistently airs her views concerning problems with public significance on social media platforms, a few of which at occasions are important concerning affairs and conduct of the administration and authorities of the day.” She was not too long ago “at loggerheads with Maharashtra authorities over dealing with of sure points” and civic officers visited her bungalow first on September 5 and pasted a cease work discover on the premises on September 8. “The officers who entered the premises in her absence did so by threatening and roughing up the safety guard and different workers current,” mentioned the petition naming 5 individuals who entered.
She mentioned “in actuality no work is being carried out”.
The actor’s lawyer raised a number of questions towards the BMC and HC needs to listen to a moot query on how the civic workers entered the premises. The BMC had rejected his September Eight reply to its discover however its squad was already lined up exterior for the demolition, her lawyer mentioned.
On Wednesday, a delegated officer of BMC H/West in its order to Kangana mentioned “after scrutinizing all of the papers and on website go to inspection, I’m happy that the work talked about within the discover schedule discovered is in progress.’’ The order mentioned the allegations in her reply have been “discovered to be baseless” and that since she had “not stopped work” and “failed to provide permission” it was “accountable for forthwith demolition.’’
The BMC additionally warned her of attainable year-long imprisonment and wonderful as much as 25000 (Rs twentyfive thousand) for the alleged unauthorised work.